SCHOLARLY INSIGHTS
UN Experiential Fellowship
Professor Ameena Zia
Governments worldwide commit to ambitious international development frameworks such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Paris Climate Agreement, and various human rights conventions. However, ensuring compliance often requires external pressure. Civil society organizations (CSOs), activists, and grassroots movements play a crucial role in holding governments accountable through strategic advocacy, legal action, and public mobilization.
Scholarly work on governance and civil society underscores the importance of external accountability mechanisms. The works of Keck and Sikkink (1998) on transnational advocacy networks demonstrate how local movements gain traction through international alliances. Similarly, Putnam’s (1993) research on social capital highlights how civic engagement fosters institutional accountability and better governance outcomes. These theories provide a useful framework for understanding how civil society enforces government commitments in different political and institutional contexts.
Civil Society Accountability Mechanisms Worldwide
Advocacy and legal pressure have proven effective in multiple cases. In Germany, youth-led protests and legal challenges resulted in the Federal Constitutional Court ruling against weak climate policies, compelling the government to adopt stronger commitments in line with SDG 13 on climate action. This aligns with theories of legal mobilization, where civil society leverages judicial institutions to push for policy change (Epp, 1998). Similarly, in South Africa, the Treatment Action Campaign (TAC) successfully pressured the government to implement the world’s largest public HIV treatment program, aligning with SDG 3 on good health and well-being. This case exemplifies the power of social movements in shaping public health policies, as discussed in the work of Tarrow (2011) on contentious politics.
Monitoring and transparency initiatives have also played a crucial role in enforcing accountability. In Kenya, civil society exposed corruption in school funding, leading to increased transparency and policy reforms, furthering SDG 4 on quality education. The concept of participatory governance, as outlined by Fung and Wright (2003), highlights how transparency initiatives strengthen democratic accountability. India’s Right to Information (RTI) Act, championed by civil society, has empowered citizens by exposing corruption and promoting institutional accountability in line with SDG 16 on strong institutions and anti-corruption. The effectiveness of such mechanisms can be understood through the lens of accountability theories, particularly the work of Bovens (2007), who emphasizes the role of institutional checks and balances in governance.
Public mobilization and grassroots action are powerful tools for policy change. In Brazil, indigenous and environmental groups successfully halted destructive policies and pressured the government to reinstate environmental protections, advancing SDG 15 on life on land. This aligns with the concept of environmental justice movements, which scholars like Martinez-Alier (2002) argue are critical in resisting exploitative policies. The global climate movement, including Fridays for Future and climate strikes, has influenced policy changes and international negotiations through sustained activism, demonstrating Tilly’s (2004) framework on social movements and sustained contention.
Strategic partnerships and international pressure have also been instrumental in driving government accountability. In South Africa, CSOs collaborated with UN agencies and NGOs to push for large-scale HIV/AIDS treatment programs. In Brazil, civil society pressured multinational companies to stop sourcing from deforested regions, indirectly compelling the government to take action against deforestation. This reflects the power of transnational advocacy networks, as outlined by Keck and Sikkink (1998), where international pressure serves as a crucial enforcement mechanism.
Strategies for Civil Society
Strengthening legal advocacy and policy engagement is crucial for ensuring accountability. Civil society can leverage decentralized governance structures to advocate for policy reforms at different levels of government. Public Interest Litigations (PILs) can be filed in courts, using international commitments as legal arguments. Additionally, engaging with parliamentary committees to lobby legislators for stronger policies on climate change, gender rights, and transparency can help enhance enforcement mechanisms for existing development policies. This aligns with the concept of legal institutionalism, where legal frameworks serve as tools for policy transformation (Hall & Taylor, 1996).
Enhancing transparency and public oversight requires the use of digital tools for accountability. Expanding citizen-led budget tracking initiatives, similar to Kenya’s education model, can improve governance. Platforms that monitor policy progress and expose inefficiencies can increase transparency. Strengthening investigative journalism by utilizing Right to Information (RTI) laws to uncover corruption and expose the misuse of public funds can highlight policy failures and drive reforms. According to Schudson (2015), investigative journalism serves as a watchdog that reinforces democratic accountability.
Public mobilization and grassroots engagement can drive impactful change. Organizing non-partisan social movements that focus on issue-based advocacy can transcend political divides and gain widespread support. Gender rights movements, for example, have successfully raised awareness and pushed for national discussions. Youth-led climate and development movements can serve as models for local activism, drawing inspiration from global environmental advocacy efforts. Furthermore, using religious and cultural narratives to frame environmental protection and social justice issues can build broader support for policy changes. Scott’s (1985) work on everyday resistance demonstrates how cultural frameworks influence mobilization strategies.
Building strategic partnerships is another key approach. Engaging international development agencies such as the UN, World Bank, and IMF can ensure that foreign aid aligns with development obligations. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives can encourage businesses to participate in SDGs, indirectly pressuring the government to implement necessary reforms. Private sector accountability measures can complement government-led efforts in achieving sustainable development goals. The concept of shared value (Porter & Kramer, 2011) highlights how businesses can align profit motives with social impact.
Leveraging international pressure and diplomacy can reinforce civil society’s impact. Engaging the diaspora in lobbying foreign governments and international institutions can help highlight governance failures on a global stage. Submitting shadow reports to the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and SDG progress assessments can hold governments accountable in global forums, creating external pressure that serves as a catalyst for domestic reforms. This approach is supported by Risse, Ropp, and Sikkink’s (1999) spiral model of human rights change, which outlines how international norms influence domestic policies through external pressure.
Summary
Civil society plays a critical role in ensuring governments adhere to international development commitments. By combining legal advocacy, transparency measures, grassroots mobilization, strategic partnerships, and international pressure, civil society can push for climate action, gender equality, governance reforms, and sustainable development. Theoretical frameworks from social movements, legal institutionalism, and transnational advocacy highlight the mechanisms through which civil society can drive accountability and policy change.
References
Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.
Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.
Epp, C. R. (1998). The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. University of Chicago Press.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 31(1), 5–43.
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
Martínez-Alier, J. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Environmental Politics, 1(1), 20–44.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Risse, T., Ropp, S. C., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change. Cambridge University Press.
Schudson, M. (2015). The rise of the right to know: Politics and the culture of transparency, 1945–1975. Harvard University Press.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (2004). Social movements, 1768–2004. Paradigm Publishers.
Comments